Not allowing others to refute psychology

The mentality of not allowing others to refute is usually related to defensive self-esteem or excessive control, which may manifest as stubbornness, excessive self-defense, or intensified interpersonal conflicts. The formation of such psychology is mainly caused by suppressed growth environment, perfectionism tendency, low self-identity, anxious personality traits, and experience of authority suppression.

1. Suppressed upbringing environment

During childhood, individuals are often subjected to a high-pressure and controlled parenting environment, which can lead them to equate external questioning with self denial. This group of people often maintain psychological balance through absolute cognition, such as understanding differences in opinions as attacks on their own personality. In family therapy, it is often found that parents have a black-and-white communication pattern.

2. Perfectionism tendency

Individuals who have high demands on their self-image may view others' rebuttals as a destruction of their perfect image. This group of people often exhibit compulsive behavior of excessive preparation, which may manifest in the workplace as excessive modification of plans but refusal to adopt team suggestions. Cognitive behavioral therapy shows abnormal activity in the processing of erroneous information in the prefrontal cortex of the brain.

3. Low self-identity

When the internal value is unstable, individuals will obtain a false sense of control by suppressing opposing voices. Psychological experiments have confirmed that this group of people experience a significant increase in amygdala activation when faced with rebuttal, leading to physiological stress reactions such as increased heart rate and sweaty palms, essentially a fear of cognitive collapse.

4. Anxiety personality traits

Individuals with generalized anxiety characteristics often equate uncertainty with danger. When a viewpoint is challenged, its brain triggers defense mechanisms similar to survival threats. Clinical observations have found that this group of people tend to involuntarily increase their volume or repeat the same statements during debates, which is a typical psychological compensatory behavior.

5. Those who have experienced power oppression in early important relationships are prone to forming a reverse defense mechanism. For example, individuals who have been severely criticized may develop into treating others in the same way as adults. The psychoanalytic school believes that this is a compulsive repetition of childhood trauma, using role replacement to alleviate the sense of powerlessness of the past. Improving this type of psychology requires starting with establishing a safe sense of self-worth, which can be achieved by recording specific emotional experiences every time someone is refuted, distinguishing between differences in viewpoints and personality negation. In progressive exposure therapy, training begins with small exchanges of opinions, with a focus on cultivating cognitive patterns that view criticism as information rather than a threat. Practice using questioning instead of defense in daily life, such as asking if you can explain the viewpoint in detail when hearing different opinions. Group psychotherapy can provide a safe environment for viewpoint collision and learn adaptive coping strategies by observing how others handle disagreements. Appropriately increasing the intake of foods rich in omega-3 fatty acids in diet can help stabilize emotional fluctuations.