Can triceps rupture be identified as disability

Triceps brachii rupture may be identified as disability, which requires a comprehensive evaluation based on the degree of injury and functional impact. Disability assessment mainly considers the proportion of muscle function loss, the degree of limited joint mobility, and the impact on daily life and work. If the triceps brachii rupture leads to severe limitation of elbow joint extension function, it may affect basic movements such as pushing and pulling, which usually meets the disability assessment criteria. The clinical manifestation is active extension weakness of the elbow joint. MRI examination can clarify the range of tendon rupture. When muscle strength testing shows a decrease of more than a certain proportion, it may be assessed as the corresponding disability level. The presence of persistent functional impairment after rehabilitation is more likely to be identified. Partial minor fractures or good functional recovery after surgical repair may not meet the requirements for disability assessment. The probability of passing disability assessment is lower for those who have partial tendon rupture and have recovered joint mobility close to normal range through conservative treatment, and whose muscle strength test meets the standard. But if engaged in special professions that require upper limb explosive power, such as athletes, porters, etc., the evaluation criteria may be adjusted according to professional needs.

It is recommended to bring complete medical records, including initial diagnosis records, imaging reports, surgical records, rehabilitation assessment reports, etc., and apply for appraisal to qualified judicial appraisal institutions. At the same time, special examinations such as electromyography and isokinetic muscle strength testing need to be conducted in conjunction, and situations with limited daily living abilities need to be quantified and recorded through professional scales. Note that there may be slight differences in disability assessment standards in different regions, and the final conclusion of the appraisal institution shall prevail.